Romans — Chapter 14

Authorship & Background

Deep Dive

Setting: Paul writes from Corinth around AD 57 to a church he has never visited, a mix of Jewish and Gentile believers meeting in several house churches across the city (16:3–15). Chapters 1–11 laid out the gospel, and since 12:1 Paul has been showing what life looks like for people who have received God's mercy. Chapter 13 ended with love as "the fulfilling of the law" (13:10) and a call to wake up because "the day is at hand," putting away "quarreling and jealousy" (13:12–13). Chapter 14 brings that love down to a real argument in the Roman church: what a Christian may eat and which days must be kept. The section runs through 15:13. Historians add a likely background, which is a reconstruction rather than something the text states: Emperor Claudius expelled Jews from Rome around AD 49 (Acts 18:2), and when they were allowed back after his death in AD 54, Jewish believers may have returned to congregations that had become largely Gentile in leadership and habit.

Do Not Pass Judgment on One Another (vv1–12)

• "As for the one who is weak in faith, welcome him" (v1). "Welcome" is proslambanō, to take to oneself or receive. The lexicon lists it for receiving people (Acts 28:2; Phlm 17), and Paul uses it again in 15:7. In a house church it meant a seat at the meal, not just tolerance. "Weak in faith" does not mean weak in saving faith or shaky about Christ. It means a faith that has not yet grasped all the freedom it has, so the conscience is still bound on matters God has left open.
• "But not to quarrel over opinions" (v1). The Greek pairs diakrisis (judgment, discernment, deciding) with dialogismos (inward reasoning, thoughts, sometimes debate). A fair paraphrase is "not to pass verdicts on his scruples." The point is that welcoming someone is not a trap to win an argument. The weaker believer is received as a brother, not as a project.
• "One person believes he may eat anything, while the weak person eats only vegetables" (v2). "Vegetables" is lachana, garden herbs or vegetables. The Old Testament food laws never required vegetarianism, so something more is going on. The likeliest explanation is that in a pagan city it was hard to be sure meat was kosher, or that it had not been offered to an idol before it reached the market. Avoiding meat altogether was the safe course. Daniel and his friends did the same in Babylon (Dan 1:8–16), and later Jewish writings show devout Jews abroad doing likewise.
• Who were "the weak"? Readers have given three main answers. Jewish believers still keeping food laws and holy days. This is the majority view today and the Tyndale notes' reading, and it fits "clean" and "unclean" language in v14 and v20 and the Jew-and-Gentile thread through 15:7–12. Believers worried about idol meat, as in 1 Corinthians 8. JFB takes this view, and in Rome the two concerns would often overlap. Ascetics influenced by pagan or philosophical ideas about meat and wine. This is a minority view; Paul does not treat the weak as teaching a false gospel, as he does in Colossians 2. The likeliest picture is mostly Jewish believers, perhaps with Gentiles who had learned synagogue habits. Paul counts himself with the strong (15:1) but never calls the weak heretics.
• "Let not the one who eats despise the one who abstains" (v3). Each side had its own typical sin. "Despise" is exoutheneō, to treat as nothing, to look down on with contempt. It is used of the Pharisee's contempt for others (Luke 18:9). The strong were tempted to sneer. The weak were tempted to "pass judgment," to treat the strong as compromised or unfaithful. Paul gives one reason against both: "God has welcomed him." The same verb as v1 returns, now with God as the subject.
• "Who are you to pass judgment on the servant of another?" (v4). In the ancient household, only the master had the right to discipline his own slave. A believer who condemns another believer over food is overstepping, acting as if the other person's master. "He will be upheld, for the Lord is able to make him stand." The strong believer's standing rests on his Lord's power, not his brothers' approval.
• "One person esteems one day as better than another" (v5). Paul widens the question from food to days. Most think he means Jewish holy days, perhaps also fast days, and many include the weekly Sabbath (compare Col 2:16; Gal 4:10). The Tyndale notes take that view, as do many Lutheran and Baptist readers. Many Reformed and Presbyterian readers, Matthew Henry and JFB among them, think the Lord's Day and the moral weight of the fourth commandment are not in view, because the subject is matters God has left open, and the weekly day of rest belongs to the creation order and the Ten Commandments. Seventh-day Adventists likewise read the days as ceremonial or fast days rather than the weekly Sabbath. What everyone can see from the text is that the argument in Rome was about whether Christians were required to keep certain Jewish days, and Paul refused to make either answer a test of fellowship.
• "Each one should be fully convinced in his own mind" (v5). "Fully convinced" is plērophoreō, to be fully assured. Paul used it of Abraham, "fully convinced that God was able" (4:21). On matters like these, Paul wants settled convictions, not a church where everyone copies the strongest personality in the room.
• "In honor of the Lord" (v6). The key phrase repeats three times. The one who keeps the day, the one who eats, and the one who abstains all do it "in honor of the Lord," and both eater and abstainer "give thanks to God." If both bowed their heads in thanks over the meal, both were doing the same basic thing toward God.
• "None of us lives to himself" (vv7–8). This is not a general statement that people affect each other, true as that is. Paul's point is that a believer's whole life and death are lived toward the Lord. "Whether we live or whether we die, we are the Lord's." Strong and weak alike belong to Another, so neither can sit as judge.
• "Christ died and lived again, that he might be Lord" (v9). Christ's lordship over his people rests on his death and resurrection. The order in the Greek is "dead and living," following the order of his own death and rising, as the Tyndale notes observe. His rule reaches into death itself, so even believers who have died remain his.
• "Why do you pass judgment… why do you despise your brother?" (v10). Paul now speaks to each side in turn, and the word "brother" carries the weight. "We will all stand before the judgment seat of God." The "judgment seat" is bēma, a raised platform, often the tribunal of a Roman magistrate. Paul had stood before Gallio's in Corinth (Acts 18:12). The oldest manuscripts read "of God" here, while later ones read "of Christ," probably borrowed from 2 Corinthians 5:10. The two passages are not in tension: God judges through Christ (2:16; Acts 17:31).
• "Every knee shall bow to me" (v11). Paul joins "As I live, says the Lord" (a common oath formula, as in Isa 49:18) to Isaiah 45:23, a passage where the one God declares that every nation will finally bow before him. Philippians 2:10–11 applies the same verse to Jesus, a striking sign of how early Christians understood him.
• "Each of us will give an account of himself to God" (v12). The stress falls on "each" and "himself." Every believer has one account to give, and it is not an account of a brother's diet.
• Commentators: Henry reads the chapter as a remedy for quarrels about "indifferent things," and says the weak believer is to be received "not to expose him, but to instruct and strengthen him." He balances the two sins: "Those who are strong must by no means despise the weak; nor those who are weak judge the strong." On v5 he limits the days to Jewish observances and adds, "We must understand it with an exception of the Lord's day, which all Christians unanimously observed." JFB defines the weak believer as "him whose faith wants that firmness and breadth which would raise him above small scruples," and reads v1 as "not to the deciding of doubts," that is, not to argue him out of them. JFB also argues against Alford that v6 cannot be used to set aside the Sabbath, since it predates Judaism. Guzik puts the weakness of the weak in legalism and a judging spirit rather than in their diet itself, which is sharper than the Tyndale notes, which describe the weak more gently as having a tender conscience. He also distinguishes the weak from the rebellious: Paul is not asking the church to welcome open sin. On the judgment seat Guzik, citing Chuck Smith, compares the bēma to a judge's stand at athletic games where prizes were given, and treats it as a judgment of believers' rewards rather than their salvation. The lexicon gives bēma as a speaker's platform or a magistrate's tribunal and does not mention the games, so that picture is an illustration, not the word's meaning.

Do Not Cause Another to Stumble (vv13–23)

• "Let us not pass judgment… but rather decide never to put a stumbling block" (v13). Paul plays on the verb krinō, to judge or decide: stop judging each other, and judge this instead. The verse is a hinge, summing up vv1–12 and opening the rest of the chapter, which is aimed mainly at the strong. "Stumbling block" is proskomma, the same word as the "stone of stumbling" in 9:32–33, where Israel tripped over Christ. Paul pairs it with skandalon, a trap or snare. The danger is not merely annoying a fellow believer but tripping him up spiritually.
• "Nothing is unclean in itself" (v14). "Unclean" is koinos, literally "common," the Jewish term for food that was not ritually set apart. The lexicon lists the same word for "defiled" hands in Mark 7:2 and for Peter's "common or unclean" in Acts 10:14. Paul says he is "persuaded in the Lord Jesus," which most take to echo Jesus' own teaching that food does not defile, where Mark adds, "Thus he declared all foods clean" (Mark 7:19). Paul is not saying sin is in the eye of the beholder; he means food and matters like it, where God has drawn no line.
• "But it is unclean for anyone who thinks it unclean" (v14). This is the turn. The food has not changed, but a person who believes it is wrong and eats anyway is acting against what he believes God wants. That is a real failure of loyalty to God, even if the belief itself is mistaken.
• "If your brother is grieved by what you eat, you are no longer walking in love" (v15). Love, the theme of 13:8–10, comes back by name. Being "grieved" here is more than being offended at someone else's choice. In context it is the pain of being drawn, by example or pressure, to do what one's own conscience condemns.
• "Do not destroy the one for whom Christ died" (v15). "Destroy" is apollymi, a strong word often used for final ruin (2:12; John 3:16). The lexicon confirms that range. Paul is not saying a believer's salvation hangs on a fellow believer's menu. He is stating what such behavior tends toward: pushing a brother away from Christ. Readers in Arminian and Wesleyan traditions often take the warning as a real possibility of falling away; Reformed readers take it as describing the nature of the act, as in 1 Corinthians 8:11. Both agree the strong must take it seriously. The contrast is stark. Christ gave his life for this brother. The strong are asked to give up a meal.
• "Do not let what you regard as good be spoken of as evil" (v16). The "good" is probably the strong believer's freedom itself. Used carelessly, it gives the gospel a bad name, both inside the church and among outsiders who see Christians tearing at each other.
• "Not a matter of eating and drinking but of righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit" (v17). This is the key verse of the chapter. The "kingdom of God" is God's saving rule, already begun in Christ and to be completed at his return. The three words are best read as the fruit of the Spirit in the life of the community: right standing with God and right living, peace with God and with each other, and joy that the Spirit gives (compare Gal 5:22; Rom 15:13). Food does not bring a person nearer to God (1 Cor 8:8).
• "Approved by men" (v18). "Approved" (dokimos) means tested and found genuine.
• "Let us pursue what makes for peace and for mutual upbuilding" (v19). "Upbuilding" is oikodomē, the act of building, and in the New Testament always used figuratively of building others up (15:2; 1 Cor 14:26; Eph 4:12). "Pursue" is an active, chasing word. Peace in the church does not happen by default.
• "Do not, for the sake of food, destroy the work of God" (v20). The "work of God" is a fellow believer, and by extension the church God is building. The verb is not the one in v15 but katalyō, to tear down or demolish, the word Paul sets against "build" in Galatians 2:18. It is the opposite of the upbuilding in v19. Paul repeats his principle, "Everything is indeed clean," and then puts the weight on what comes after it: it is wrong to make someone stumble "by what he eats."
• "It is good not to eat meat or drink wine or do anything that causes your brother to stumble" (v21). Wine appears here for the first time, which suggests that some of the weak avoided it too. Wine was regularly poured out as an offering to pagan gods, so a scrupulous Jew might avoid it for the same reason as meat (Dan 1:8). Paul is not forbidding wine in general. Elsewhere he advises Timothy to take a little for his health (1 Tim 5:23), and Jesus made wine at Cana. Traditions differ on how to apply the verse. Many in the Methodist, Baptist and holiness traditions have used it as a principle for total abstinence in a culture where alcohol destroys many lives. Others stress that Paul is speaking of a particular situation with a particular brother, not laying down a rule for every believer for life. Both agree that love can call a believer to give up something lawful, and "or do anything" stretches the principle beyond food and drink. The KJV's longer ending, "or is offended, or is made weak," follows many later manuscripts.
• "The faith that you have, keep between yourself and God" (v22). "Faith" here means confident conviction about what God permits. The strong are not told to give up their convictions, only to stop parading them. They do not need to prove their freedom by using it in front of someone it would harm. "Blessed is the one who has no reason to pass judgment on himself for what he approves." A clear conscience before God is its own reward.
• "Whoever has doubts is condemned if he eats" (v23). "Has doubts" is diakrinō, which in the New Testament can mean to be divided in one's mind, to waver. The lexicon lists this verse under that sense, along with James 1:6. The KJV's "is damned" sounds harsher than Paul means. The word means he stands condemned, judged guilty, because he acted against his own conscience, not that he has lost his salvation over a meal.
• "Whatever does not proceed from faith is sin" (v23). In context this is not a sweeping claim about everything unbelievers do, though Augustine and others later used it that way. Paul's point is narrower and very practical: when a believer acts while thinking an action displeases God, the act is sin for that person, whatever its content. Conscience is not infallible. It can be taught and strengthened by Scripture, but it should not be overridden.
• The doxology and the end of the chapter. In a large group of later manuscripts, the closing doxology of Romans ("Now to him who is able to strengthen you," 16:25–27) appears right after 14:23. Some have it in both places, one early papyrus puts it after 15:33, and the oldest major manuscripts have it at the end of chapter 16, where the ESV prints it. Many scholars think some early copies circulated without chapters 15–16. No teaching of Romans depends on where it stands.
• Commentators: Henry calls giving up freedom for a brother's sake "a generous piece of self-denial, for which we have Paul's example," and on v14 writes that "to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, though it be his error, yet to him it is unclean." On v17 he exclaims, "Surely we serve a good Master, who makes peace and joy so essential to our religion." He reads v23 narrowly, as acting without being persuaded that something is lawful, which is a sin against conscience. JFB explains the kingdom's three gifts as righteousness toward God, peace toward others and joy within, and warns on v15 that anything which pushes a believer to violate his conscience pushes him toward the ruin of his soul. On v21 JFB notes that the three verbs in the fuller text grow weaker one after another, and treats the verse "simply as cautions against the too free use of Christian liberty," not as rules for life. On v22 he stresses "before God" as "a most important clause," and calls v23 "a maxim of unspeakable importance in the Christian life." Guzik adds a guardrail on v13: the chapter does not forbid correcting a believer where Scripture is plain, only judging where God has left matters open. He also points out that Paul gave way to the weak but never to those who tried to make their scruples a law for others, as when he refused to have Titus circumcised (Gal 2:3–5). Guzik uses v23 as a practical test for gray areas: if a believer cannot do something with a clear conscience, it is not from faith.

Pointing to Christ

Romans 14 keeps pointing past the quarrel to the Lord who stands over it. Christ "died and lived again" to be Lord of both the strong and the weak (v9). The brother being looked down on is "the one for whom Christ died" (v15). Every knee will bow at his judgment seat (vv10–11). And the pattern Paul asks the strong to follow is Christ's own, as he soon says outright: "Christ did not please himself" (15:3). The one who had every right gave up his rights, and welcomed people who had nothing to offer him (15:7). A church that welcomes one another this way shows the kingdom of God in miniature, a table where righteousness, peace and joy matter more than what is on the plate.

Commentary

• Enduring Word (David Guzik): enduringword.com Guzik examines the weak and strong, the principle of non-judgment, the judgment seat of Christ, and love limiting liberty.
• Jamieson-Fausset-Brown (1871): blueletterbible.org A critical and explanatory commentary on the whole Bible, more concise than Matthew Henry and closer to the Hebrew and Greek, with attention to historical and geographical detail. Public domain.
• Matthew Henry's Exposition (1710): blueletterbible.org A devotional verse-by-verse commentary in the Puritan tradition, still among the most widely read three centuries on. Public domain.

Videos

Articles

• Crossway: crossway.org How Paul handles disagreement between Christians over things Scripture does not settle.
• Crossway: crossway.org On the whole letter: why Romans has carried the weight it has in church history.
• Crossway: crossway.org Why Paul's own story of being overtaken by grace is the right way into the letter.
• GotQuestions.org: gotquestions.org On the whole book: an overview of the book of Romans -- who wrote it, when, why, and how it fits the rest of Scripture.

Links open on the publisher's own site. Nothing here is reproduced on this page.

Reflection

• Who Are You to Judge Another's Servant? (v.4) — Paul reminds believers that fellow Christians answer to their own Master, not to us. Where are you passing judgment on other believers over matters of conscience that Scripture leaves open?
• None of Us Lives to Ourselves (v.7) — Paul points out that our choices ripple outward and affect the people around us. How does that reality shape the way you use your personal freedom?
• We Will All Stand Before Christ's Judgment Seat (v.10) — Paul reminds believers that each person will give an account of their own life to Christ, not to fellow Christians. How does knowing you'll answer to Christ, not to other people's opinions, change how you live?
• Don't Cause a Brother to Stumble (v.13) — Paul redirects energy from judging others toward examining whether your own freedom is tripping someone else up. Is there a liberty you're exercising that's genuinely harming someone weaker in faith?
• The Kingdom Is Righteousness, Peace, and Joy (v.17) — Paul reframes the argument by insisting the kingdom of God isn't about food or drink but about deeper realities. Are you majoring on secondary disputes while neglecting what actually matters in the kingdom?
• Whatever Isn't From Faith Is Sin (v.23) — Paul closes with a conscience test: if you can't act with confidence before God, you shouldn't act at all. Is there something you're currently doing that leaves your conscience uneasy?