Romans — Chapter 7

Authorship & Background

Deep Dive

Setting: Paul writes from Corinth around AD 57 to a mixed church of Jewish and Gentile believers in Rome. Chapter 5 set Adam against Christ and ended with a startling line: "the law came in to increase the trespass" (5:20). Chapter 6 then answered the charge that grace encourages sin. Believers have died with Christ to sin and now belong to God as "slaves of righteousness," because "you are not under law but under grace" (6:14). That raises an obvious question: if believers are not under the law, was the law bad? Chapter 7 answers in two movements: believers have been released from the law (vv1–6), and the law itself is holy, but it is powerless against the sin that lives in human flesh (vv7–25). The second movement contains the most debated "I" in the New Testament.

Released from the Law (vv1–6)

• "I am speaking to those who know the law" (v1). Jewish believers had been taught the law of Moses from childhood. Many Gentile believers in Rome had first been "God-fearers," Gentiles who attended the synagogue before they came to Christ, so they knew it well too. "Brothers" (adelphoi) is a family word for the whole church, men and women alike, as the ESV footnote explains.
• "The law is binding on a person only as long as he lives" (v1). "Is binding" is kyrieuō, "to be lord over, to rule." It is the same verb Paul used in chapter 6: death no longer "has dominion" over the risen Christ (6:9), and sin "will have no dominion" over believers (6:14). Now the law is described the same way, as a power that rules. The Tyndale notes point to a similar rabbinic saying, that a dead man is free from the commandments (Babylonian Talmud, Shabbat 30a). Death ends legal obligation.
• The married woman (vv2–3). A wife is bound to her husband while he lives. If he dies, she is free to remarry, and no one calls her an adulteress. The Tyndale notes caution against treating this as an allegory where every detail stands for something. The illustration makes two simple points: death frees a person from the law, and the end of one relationship opens the way to a new one.
• Who dies? (v4). Pressing the details creates a puzzle. In the illustration the husband dies and the wife remarries. In the application it is the believers who die, not the law. Paul will not say the law died, since it is "holy and righteous and good" (v12). What changed is the believer's relationship to it.
• "You also have died to the law through the body of Christ" (v4). "Have died" is thanatoō, "to put to death," a stronger word than Paul's usual "died." It points to a violent death, the cross. Believers were united with Christ in his death (6:3–6), so when his body was put to death, their old obligation to the law ended with it (Gal 2:19–20).
• "So that you may belong to another… in order that we may bear fruit for God" (v4). The freedom is not freedom to be no one's. It is freedom to be married to the risen Christ. The marriage picture continues: union with Christ bears fruit, a changed life (Gal 5:22–23).
• "While we were living in the flesh" (v5). "The flesh" here is not the physical body. It is a whole way of life, human existence lived apart from God and under sin's rule. "Sinful passions, aroused by the law" is a hard phrase. The law did not create the passions, but its commands stirred them up, the way a "do not touch" sign makes the hand itch.
• "Released from the law" (v6). "Released" is katargeō, the same verb used in v2 of the widow "released from the law of marriage." With "from," as here, the lexicon gives "to be discharged or loosed from."
• "The new way of the Spirit and not in the old way of the written code" (v6). "Written code" is gramma, "letter," the law as an external written authority, carved on stone. Paul draws the same contrast in 2 Corinthians 3:6: "the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life." The prophets promised a day when God would write his law on hearts and put his Spirit within his people (Jer 31:33; Ezek 36:26–27).
• Two verses that map the rest of the argument. Many scholars note that v5 (life in the flesh, sin aroused by the law, death) is unpacked in 7:7–25, and v6 (release, new life in the Spirit) is unpacked in 8:1–17. The Spirit, named in v6, is not mentioned again until chapter 8, where he is named about twenty times.
• Commentators: All three read the marriage illustration as a picture of death ending a legal tie. Henry: "The law of marriage is binding till the death of one of the parties, no matter which, and no longer." JFB insists the details matter in one respect: "it was essential to his argument that we, not the law, should be the dying party." It renders v4 "were slain," and the lexicon supports the stronger sense of thanatoō, "put to death." Guzik observes that chapter 6 spoke of dying to sin, while here believers die to the law, which no longer serves as the way of being right with God or of living for him. He and Henry both stress that the goal of the new marriage is fruit. Henry: "the great end of our marriage to Christ is our fruitfulness in love, and grace, and every good work."

The Law and Sin (vv7–25)

• "What then shall we say? That the law is sin?" (v7). After vv5–6, a reader might conclude that the law is evil, since it aroused sinful passions and had to be escaped. Paul refuses with his strongest denial, "By no means!" The rest of the chapter defends the law and blames sin.
• "I would not have known what it is to covet" (v7). Paul quotes the tenth commandment, "You shall not covet" (Exod 20:17; Deut 5:21). The choice is telling. The tenth reaches inside, to desire itself. Paul could call himself "blameless" in outward righteousness under the law (Phil 3:6), but this command exposed his heart. The Greek epithymia means desire, and especially desire for what is forbidden.- The shift to "I" (v7). From here to the end of the chapter Paul speaks in the first person singular, dozens of times. Verses 7–13 are mostly in the past tense ("I was once alive… I died"). From v14 the verbs change to the present tense ("I am of the flesh… I do not do what I want"). Who this "I" is, and why the tense changes, is the great question of the chapter (see the bullet on v14).
• "Sin, seizing an opportunity through the commandment" (v8). "Opportunity" is aphormē. The lexicon gives its basic sense as "a starting point," and in war "a base of operations." Sin is pictured as an enemy that seizes the commandment as a foothold and raids from there, stirring up "all kinds of covetousness."- "Apart from the law, sin lies dead" (v8). Sin was not absent, but it was dormant, like a sleeping enemy. The law woke it and showed it for what it was.
• "I was once alive apart from the law" (v9). There are several readings. Some think Paul means his early childhood, before he understood the law's demands. The Tyndale notes allow this and add that the pattern fits everyone's experience. Others think he means his years as a confident Pharisee, alive in his own estimation until the tenth commandment hit home. Still others hear Adam in Eden, alive before the one command came, or Israel before Sinai, when "the commandment came" to a whole nation. Whatever the exact reference, "sin came alive and I died" describes the moment the law exposed a person as a sinner under its sentence.
• "The very commandment that promised life proved to be death to me" (v10). The law did promise life: "if a person does them, he shall live by them" (Lev 18:5, quoted at 10:5). The fault was not in the promise but in the people receiving it.- "Sin… deceived me and through it killed me" (v11). "Deceived" is exapataō, "to deceive thoroughly, to beguile." Paul uses the same word of the serpent deceiving Eve (2 Cor 11:3; compare 1 Tim 2:14). The Tyndale notes suggest Paul may be thinking of Genesis 3. The parallels are close: one command, a deceiver who twists it, desire for what is forbidden, and death. Whatever else the "I" is, the story echoes Eden.
• "So the law is holy" (v12). Paul's verdict: "holy and righteous and good." The problem is what sin does with it.
• "Did that which is good, then, bring death to me?" (v13). Again, "By no means!" Sin brought death, using a good thing as its weapon. Anything that can turn God's own holy command into a weapon of death is shown to be "sinful beyond measure."
• "The law is spiritual, but I am of the flesh, sold under sin" (v14). "Spiritual" means the law comes from God's Spirit and reflects his character. "Of the flesh" is sarkinos, "made of flesh." Older Greek texts behind the King James read sarkikos ("fleshly, carnal"), but the lexicon judges the manuscript evidence "decisive" for sarkinos. The two are close, but sarkinos stresses what a person is made of, frail and human. "Sold" is pipraskō, the word used of selling a person into slavery (Matt 18:25). The Old Testament uses the same language of Israel and of King Ahab, who "sold" themselves to do evil (1 Kings 21:20; 2 Kings 17:17).
• Who is the "I"? Faithful Christians have disagreed for sixteen centuries. The main views:
• View 1: Paul as a mature believer. On this reading Paul describes his ongoing struggle with sin as a Christian. The reasons: the switch to the present tense in v14; the "I" delights in God's law "in my inner being" (v22), which an unbeliever cannot honestly say (8:7); and v25 comes after the thanks for deliverance and still says, "I myself serve the law of God with my mind, but with my flesh I serve the law of sin." Augustine held this view in his later years, after first holding the next one. Luther, Calvin and most of the Reformed tradition followed him. On this reading the most mature saints feel sin's pull most keenly.
• View 2: a person under the law, without the Spirit. On this reading Paul describes life under the law apart from Christ, his own former life or the experience of any person under the law, now seen with Christian eyes. The reasons: "sold under sin" (v14) and "captive to the law of sin" (v23) are hard to square with "having been set free from sin" (6:18) and "the law of the Spirit of life has set you free" (8:2); v5 places this struggle "while we were living in the flesh"; and the Spirit, the believer's power against sin, is never mentioned in vv7–25. Many of the early Greek fathers, including Origen and Chrysostom, read it this way, as did John Wesley and many modern scholars.
• View 3: Israel, or Adam. Some scholars hear the story of Israel receiving the law at Sinai and Adam receiving the command in Eden, told in Paul's own voice. This works best for vv7–13 and is often combined with one of the other views.
• A mediating view. Some think Paul describes a believer trying to obey in his own strength rather than by the Spirit. Others see the tension of the "already and not yet": a real Christian, saved now, but still living in a mortal body that awaits redemption (8:23).
• What the views share. Every view agrees on Paul's main point: the law, good as it is, cannot give the power to obey. Deliverance comes only "through Jesus Christ our Lord" (v25).
• "I do not do what I want, but I do the very thing I hate" (v15). The heart of the struggle: knowing the good, wanting the good, and failing to do it. Even pagan writers knew the experience. The Roman poet Ovid has a character say, "I see the better and approve it, but I follow the worse."
• "It is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells within me" (vv17, 20). This is not an excuse. The Tyndale notes stress that Paul is not dodging responsibility. Because he really does want to obey, the cause of his failure must lie in something besides his will: sin, pictured as a squatter living in the house.
• "Nothing good dwells in me, that is, in my flesh" (v18). The qualification matters. Paul does not say there is nothing good in him at all, since he desires the good. But in his "flesh," his fallen human nature, sin has the upper hand. The Tyndale notes allow "flesh" to mean either his former life before redemption or the part of him still tied to this world, which fits the disagreement over the "I."
• "So I find it to be a law" (v21). Paul plays on the word law (nomos). Here it means a principle, a pattern that keeps repeating. Four "laws" appear in vv21–25: the law of God, the law of the mind, the law of sin, and "another law" in the members.
• "I delight in the law of God, in my inner being" (v22). "Delight" is synēdomai, literally "to rejoice with," and it is used only here in the New Testament. It echoes the psalmist whose "delight is in the law of the LORD" (Ps 1:2; 119:35). The "inner being" (literally "the inner man") is the self that is "being renewed day by day" (2 Cor 4:16).
• "Waging war… making me captive" (v23). The language is military. "Making me captive" is aichmalōtizō, "to take prisoner," used of people "led captive" in war (Luke 21:24).
• "Wretched man that I am!" (v24). "Wretched" is talaipōros, "distressed, miserable." Its only other use in the New Testament is the Laodicean church that thought it was rich but was "wretched, pitiable, poor, blind, and naked" (Rev 3:17). The difference is that the Laodiceans did not know their condition, and Paul does.
• "Who will deliver me from this body of death?" (v24). "Deliver" is rhyomai, "to rescue." Paul uses it again of Christ in 11:26: "the Deliverer will come from Zion." Notice that the cry is "who," not "what." Paul is not looking for a better method but for a rescuer. "This body of death" is the body as the place where sin works and death is already at work. Preachers often compare it to the cruel king Mezentius in Virgil's poetry, who tied living men to corpses. It is a vivid illustration, but there is no sign Paul had it in mind.
• "Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord!" (v25). The answer bursts in before the argument is finished. The full answer comes in 8:1–4: "There is therefore now no condemnation," because God did in Christ "what the law… could not do."
• "So then, I myself serve the law of God with my mind" (v25). The chapter ends with a summary of the divided self, after the cry of thanks. Those who read the "I" as a believer see this as decisive: even the rescued Christian lives with this tension until the resurrection. Those who read it as life under the law see Paul summing up the passage before turning to chapter 8. A few modern scholars have proposed moving this sentence before v24, but no manuscript supports that.
• Commentators: Henry and JFB both read vv14–25 as the struggle of a believer. Henry notes the other view but concludes, "It seems rather to be understood of the struggles that are maintained between grace and corruption in sanctified souls." He explains "sold under sin" by original sin: the believer is "sold under sin, because conceived in iniquity and born in sin." JFB takes vv7–13 as Paul's own unconverted experience written up "for greater vividness," but vv14–25 as a renewed man. It says the delight of v22 belongs to a state "to which the unregenerate man is a stranger" and calls v24 "the cry of a living but agonized believer." Guzik leans the same way: he takes "the inner being" as the real, renewed Paul. But he holds the question loosely, arguing that anyone who tries to obey in his own strength meets this struggle, whether converted or not. He notes that Paul speaks of himself constantly until v24 turns his eyes outward to a deliverer. On v9 Henry says Paul was "alive in his own opinion and apprehension, very secure and confident of the goodness of his state," and on v11, "Sin puts a cheat upon the sinner, and it is a fatal cheat." Guzik agrees with the Tyndale notes that aphormē (v8) is a military "base of operations," and the lexicon supports this. Two of Guzik's word claims need care. He explains "carnal" in v14 from sarkikos, but the better-attested reading is sarkinos ("made of flesh"). And he says talaipōros means wretched through the exhaustion of hard labor, but the lexicon gives only "distressed, miserable, wretched," so that shade should not be pressed. On v24 JFB takes "body" as the instrument through which sin acts, while Henry allows either the mortal body or the corrupt nature.

Pointing to Christ

Romans 7 refuses to blame God's law and refuses to excuse sin. The law is holy, but it cannot change a human heart. It can only diagnose the disease and expose how deep it runs. Whatever the "I" is, the chapter drives toward one cry and one answer. The cry is not "what will fix me?" but "Who will deliver me?" The answer is a person: Jesus Christ, who died so that believers might "belong to another, to him who has been raised from the dead" (v4), and who gives the Spirit to do what the written code never could.

Commentary

• Enduring Word (David Guzik): enduringword.com Guzik examines the marriage analogy, the Law's purpose, and the inner struggle — addressing the debate about who Paul is describing.
• Jamieson-Fausset-Brown (1871): blueletterbible.org A critical and explanatory commentary on the whole Bible, more concise than Matthew Henry and closer to the Hebrew and Greek, with attention to historical and geographical detail. Public domain.
• Matthew Henry's Exposition (1710): blueletterbible.org A devotional verse-by-verse commentary in the Puritan tradition, still among the most widely read three centuries on. Public domain.

Videos

Articles

• GotQuestions.org: gotquestions.org Whether Paul is describing his life before Christ or after it, and why the answer matters pastorally.
• Crossway: crossway.org On the whole letter: why Romans has carried the weight it has in church history.
• Crossway: crossway.org Why Paul's own story of being overtaken by grace is the right way into the letter.
• GotQuestions.org: gotquestions.org On the whole book: an overview of the book of Romans -- who wrote it, when, why, and how it fits the rest of Scripture.

Links open on the publisher's own site. Nothing here is reproduced on this page.

Reflection

• Freed From the Law to Belong to Christ (vv.1-4) — Paul uses a marriage analogy to show that believers have died to the law's claim on them so they can now belong to Christ and bear fruit for Him. Are you still relating to God mainly through rule-keeping, or through your new relationship with Christ?
• The Law Itself Is Good (v.12) — Paul insists the law is holy, righteous, and good, even though sin exploits it. How does knowing the real problem is sin, not God's commands, change how you view Scripture's demands?
• Wanting Good, Doing Evil (vv.18-19) — Paul describes the frustrating gap between the good he wants to do and the sin he keeps falling into. Does this honest struggle discourage you, or does it remind you that the fight itself is evidence of new life?
• Delighting in God's Law Inwardly (v.22) — Even amid the struggle, Paul says his inner self genuinely delights in God's law. Is there real delight in God's Word underneath your failures, or has the struggle worn that delight down?
• The Cry for a Deliverer (v.24) — Paul's wretched cry admits he cannot rescue himself from this ongoing battle. Have you reached the same conclusion — that self-effort alone cannot produce lasting holiness?
• Thanking God Through Jesus Christ (v.25) — Paul answers his own cry not with a technique but with a person: Jesus Christ our Lord. Are you depending on Christ for deliverance, or still quietly relying on your own willpower?